Thanks for your message. Some details would be great to go along with your opinion, ie. misleading how? The article was based on a group project looking at logging issues from three different perspectives: industry, the government, and first nations. We tried to represent all three sides as best we could, but of course even when researching the issue thoroughly we may not have gotten everything perfect. It would be great if you could provide more details here on what was was incorrect in the article because your message here was pretty general and really just sounding like you are venting some anger. I can't tell if you took issue with the industry perspective, the government perspective, the first nations perspective, all three or something in particular. Throwing insults at someone trying to provide a balanced view of the issue really doesn't help educate others, so some facts would be great, thanks.
- Suzanne, webmaster ScienceLives.com